Washington: Efforts to reach a breakthrough between the United States and Iran hit a major roadblock during high-level negotiations in Islamabad, with deep divisions over Tehran’s nuclear programme ultimately stalling progress.
At the centre of the impasse was a sharp disagreement on how long Iran should halt its uranium enrichment activities. According to multiple reports, Washington pushed for a prolonged suspension of up to two decades, while Tehran signalled willingness for only a limited pause of around five years. The wide gap between the two proposals proved too significant to bridge during the discussions.
The talks, which stretched for nearly 24 hours under Pakistan’s mediation, marked one of the most senior direct engagements between the two countries in decades. Despite moments of optimism and indications that both sides were close to a framework, negotiators failed to settle key differences before concluding the round.
Sources familiar with the discussions indicated that while both delegations exchanged draft proposals and explored possible compromises, tensions resurfaced when guarantees related to sanctions relief and non-aggression were raised. Iranian representatives reportedly expressed deep mistrust, citing past experiences where diplomatic assurances were followed by military escalation.
Beyond the nuclear issue, other contentious topics included the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz—vital for global energy supplies—and the removal of international sanctions imposed on Tehran. While the United States focused primarily on nuclear safeguards and maritime access, Iran sought a broader agreement addressing multiple geopolitical concerns.
Despite the breakdown, officials on both sides suggested that diplomacy is not over. Conversations about a potential second round of talks are already underway, with intermediaries continuing efforts to bring the two sides back to the negotiating table.
Observers note that although the latest round ended without a deal, the fact that both nations engaged in direct and prolonged dialogue signals a willingness to keep channels open. However, unless a middle ground is found on the nuclear timeline, any comprehensive agreement may remain elusive.
