Encounter News Punjabi

Supreme Court dismisses PIL for mandatory voting citing policy domain

WhatsApp Channel Join Now

New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India on Thursday, April 16, 2026, declined to entertain a Public Interest Litigation seeking to make voting compulsory across the country. A bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, along with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M. Pancholi, ruled that such a mandate falls strictly within the policy domain of the government and cannot be dictated by the judiciary. The court emphasized that democratic participation must be driven by public awareness and civic responsibility rather than legal coercion or punitive measures. The petitioner, Ajay Goel, had urged the court to direct the Election Commission to implement penal consequences for non-voters and restrict government benefits for those who willfully abstain from exercising their franchise.

During the proceedings, Chief Justice Surya Kant remarked that for 75 years, India has demonstrated a deep-seated belief in democracy through voluntary participation. He questioned the logic of criminalizing the act of staying home and asked rhetorically if the court should direct the arrest of those who do not vote. The bench highlighted that awareness is the key to increasing turnout, not compulsion. The court also pointed out the significant practical hurdles of a mandatory voting law, noting that many citizens, including essential workers and judicial officers, are required to perform their professional duties on election days. Justice Bagchi added that judicial work is equally important and should not be disrupted by a mandatory requirement to travel for voting on a working day.

The bench expressed particular concern for the marginalized sections of society, specifically daily-wage earners who might have to choose between earning a living and casting a vote. The judges noted that a legal mandate would unfairly burden the poor who cannot afford to lose a day’s wages. By referring the petitioner to the appropriate government stakeholders, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that any change to the current voluntary voting system is a legislative decision. The ruling comes as several states prepare for upcoming assembly elections, reinforcing the principle that the right to vote remains a voluntary exercise of democratic choice in India.

All news on Encounter News is computer-generated and sourced from third parties. Please read and verify carefully. We will not be responsible for any issues. 

Encounter News
Encounter News
Encounter Media Group

Latest Articles

Supreme Court Rejects Plea Seeking Mandatory Ethanol Content Labelling at Petrol Pumps

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petition seeking...

IAF’s Sarang Helicopter Display Team Arrives in Egypt for El Alamein International Airshow

El Alamein (Egypt): The Indian Air Force’s renowned Sarang Helicopter Display...

India Categorically Rejects ‘Illegal’ Court of Arbitration Award on Indus Waters Treaty

New Delhi: India on Monday firmly rejected an award issued by...

PM Narendra Modi Meets Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian at SCO Summit in Bishkek

New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi held a bilateral meeting with...

NCSC Directs Punjab Authorities to Arrest Raja Warring Within Five Days Over Remarks Against Buta Singh

Chandigarh: The National Commission for Scheduled Castes has directed Punjab authorities...

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman Arrives in US for G20 Ministerial and Investor Engagements

New Delhi: Union Minister for Finance and Corporate Affairs Nirmala Sitharaman...

Comments

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here