Washington: The administration of Donald Trump has stated that the ongoing conflict with Iran should be considered concluded, citing the ceasefire that took effect earlier this month. The move is being seen as a legal and strategic interpretation that could allow the White House to bypass the need for congressional authorization under US war powers law.
Officials argue that active hostilities, which began in late February, effectively came to an end once both sides halted direct military engagement following a ceasefire initiated in early April. According to senior figures in the administration, there has been no exchange of fire between US and Iranian forces since the truce began.
During a recent Senate appearance, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth reinforced this stance, describing the ceasefire as a decisive pause that, in practical terms, ended the conflict. This interpretation is significant because US law requires the executive branch to seek approval from Congress if military operations extend beyond 60 days.
However, the situation on the ground remains complex. Despite the cessation of direct clashes, Iran continues to exert control over the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz, a crucial route for global oil shipments. At the same time, the US Navy has maintained restrictions on Iranian maritime trade, creating an ongoing standoff in the region.
Tehran has warned that any renewed military action by Washington would trigger a severe response. Iranian officials have indicated that future retaliation could involve prolonged and intensified strikes targeting US interests, raising concerns that the fragile calm could quickly unravel.
While the administration’s position frames the conflict as concluded, analysts note that the underlying tensions between the two sides remain unresolved, leaving the region in a state of uneasy pause rather than lasting peace.
