Jerusalem/Washington: Fresh details have emerged of a reportedly tense conversation between US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over the future of military action against Iran, exposing differences in how Washington and Tel Aviv want to handle the conflict.
According to international media reports, the two leaders held an intense hour-long phone call in which Netanyahu strongly pressed for immediate renewed strikes on Iranian targets. Trump, however, urged restraint, insisting that diplomatic channels should be given more time before military action is reconsidered.
Sources familiar with the discussion claimed the Israeli prime minister expressed deep frustration over the delay, believing Iran should face sustained military pressure to further damage its defence systems and strategic infrastructure.
Trump is said to have informed Netanyahu that regional mediators are working on a draft framework that could formally halt hostilities and pave the way for fresh negotiations with Tehran. The proposal is reportedly being shaped with the involvement of Gulf nations and other diplomatic partners, aiming to create a temporary window for broader talks covering Iran’s nuclear ambitions and maritime security issues.
Despite the disagreement, Trump maintained publicly that relations with Netanyahu remain strong and suggested that all options remain on the table if diplomacy fails to deliver results.
Speaking to reporters, Trump indicated that while negotiations appear promising, Washington is fully prepared to launch large-scale military action at short notice if Tehran refuses to meet expectations.
Reports suggest Netanyahu remains deeply sceptical about Iran’s intentions and fears that pausing military pressure could allow Tehran valuable time to regroup.
The latest standoff highlights growing strategic tension between two close allies as efforts continue to broker a longer-term resolution to the Iran crisis. Diplomats are now racing against time to secure a breakthrough before military escalation once again becomes the preferred option.
