Encounter News Punjabi

Supreme Court Clarifies Election Commission Cannot Decide Citizenship Under Special Intensive Revision

WhatsApp Channel Join Now

New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India reiterated that the Election Commission of India does not possess the constitutional or statutory authority to determine the citizenship status of individuals. The observations were made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice V. Mohana while hearing a fresh plea concerning the exclusion of deleted voters from public welfare schemes. Recalling its earlier landmark judgment on the Special Intensive Revision in Bihar, the bench emphasized that the poll body’s mandate under Article 324 is strictly confined to the preparation, maintenance, and superintendence of accurate electoral rolls. Justice Bagchi explicitly noted that while the commission can conduct a limited inquiry to decide voting eligibility, it cannot assume the role of a final adjudicating authority on nationality.

The apex court clarified the precise legal framework to be followed when the poll body encounters cases of suspected or doubtful citizenship during voter verification drives. If the commission finds an individual’s citizenship status questionable, it holds a corresponding administrative duty to refer the matter directly to the Ministry of Home Affairs or the designated competent central authority under the Citizenship Act, 1955. The bench firmly stated that the commission cannot act as a constitutional tribunal to decide citizenship under Articles 9, 10, 11, and 12 of the Constitution, as that power remains exclusively within the domain of the Union government and its statutory tribunals.

Furthermore, the court provided critical relief regarding the legal standing of individuals under scrutiny, affirming that a person’s legal status as a citizen remains intact until a formal adjudication is completed by the competent authority under the Citizenship Act. The ruling comes amid growing concerns raised by civil rights petitioners that names removed during intensive voter roll purges were leading to immediate socioeconomic hardships, including the arbitrary denial of essential state welfare entitlements. While upholding the body’s right to maintain clean voter lists, the supreme court’s strict demarcation ensures that bureaucratic deletion from an electoral roll does not automatically translate into a declaration of alienage or statelessness.

All news on Encounter News is computer-generated and sourced from third parties. Please read and verify carefully. We will not be responsible for any issues. 

Encounter News
Encounter News
Encounter Media Group

Latest Articles

Marco Rubio Downplays India-Iran Trade Deal Speculation, Warns Against Sanctions Evasion

Washington DC: United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that...

Abhishek Banerjee Accuses BJP of Early Morning Vandalism at TMC Camac Street Office

Kolkata: Trinamool Congress national general secretary Abhishek Banerjee on Thursday alleged...

EPFO Launches Amnesty Scheme for Unauthorised PF Trusts and Opens Special Employee Enrolment Window

NEW DELHI — The Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation has introduced a...

Bollywood Actor Sonu Sood Visits Flood-Hit Nepal to Support Relief Efforts as Death Toll Rises

KATHMANDU — Bollywood actor and humanitarian Sonu Sood arrived in Nepal...

Indian National Among 12 Dead in Heavy Russian Air Assault Across Ukraine

KYIV — An Indian citizen was among 12 people killed following...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice to Centre and FSSAI Over Ban on Fortune Soya Health Oil

NEW DELHI — The Delhi High Court has sought responses from...

Comments

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here