Chandigarh: Responding to the growing impact of the global fuel crisis, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has introduced a series of measures aimed at reducing fuel consumption while ensuring that judicial work continues without disruption.
The court administration has issued fresh directions promoting digital functioning and operational efficiency, with greater reliance on virtual proceedings and selective work-from-home arrangements for staff.
As part of the new strategy, court hearings will increasingly be conducted through video conferencing. Registrars have been instructed to ensure smooth technical coordination by sharing virtual hearing links with all concerned parties well in advance and resolving connectivity issues promptly.
The move is expected to reduce daily travel requirements for lawyers, litigants and judicial officers, thereby lowering overall fuel usage.
In another notable step, judges have been encouraged to adopt carpooling arrangements while commuting to court. The administration believes shared transport can significantly cut fuel consumption if implemented consistently.
At the administrative level, up to one-third of staff members in selected branches may now be allowed to work remotely wherever the nature of duties permits. However, officials have clarified that essential personnel will continue to remain physically present to ensure smooth functioning of court operations.
Employees working from home will be required to remain reachable at all times through phone or digital communication and must report to office immediately if directed.
The High Court has entrusted Registrars with the responsibility of conducting weekly reviews of these arrangements. They will prepare advance duty rosters, assess productivity levels and make recommendations based on operational needs.
The administration has also made it clear that if remote working affects efficiency in any branch, the arrangement may be modified or withdrawn after due approval from the Registrar General.
Legal circles have described the decision as a practical response to rising fuel concerns, balancing conservation efforts with uninterrupted judicial functioning.
Officials believe the measures could serve as a model for other institutions seeking to manage resources more effectively during periods of economic and energy uncertainty.
